Tile scaleX (and scaleY) gives an incorrect value when it's negative and rotation is not equal to 0

Haxe
#1

var tile = new Tile(0, 0, 0, -1, 1, 0);
trace(tile.scaleX); // -1 - true

var tile = new Tile(0, 0, 0, -1, 1, 45);
trace(tile.scaleX); // 1 - false

var tile = new Tile(0, 0, 0, 1, -1, 0);
trace(tile.scaleY); // -1 - true

var tile = new Tile(0, 0, 0, 1, -1, 45);
trace(tile.scaleY); // 1 - false

#2

Try this commit:

I believe it should preserve the rendering behavior, while also making the return values of scaleX, scaleY and rotation preserve negative values as desired

#3

I’ve tried it with the newest dev versions of OpenFL and Lime and it has the same result as sooner.

I guess there are some troubles in Tile matrix geometry, because I have different behaviour on flash and not flash targets when I’m using matrix to change Tile inheritors parameters. And everything was ok while I used direct access to its properties like x,y, scaleX, scaleY.

Left - flash, right - neko.

#4

https://gist.github.com/wolfhoundgelert/2eeb95162f6c442f3e50559b3785782f

https://gist.github.com/wolfhoundgelert/1fbf915ca2b1d808c8f99b8722d0bd4a

#5

I think that the same bug https://github.com/openfl/openfl/issues/1240

I’ll try your commit.

#6

I guess there are some troubles in Tile matrix geometry, because I have different behaviour on flash and not flash targets when I’m using matrix to change Tile inheritors parameters. And everything was ok while I used direct access to its properties like x,y, scaleX, scaleY.

Left - flash, right - neko.

A-HA-HA!

I’ve fixed it on not flash platforms with “matrix = matrix;” after “matrix.setTo(…);”

))))))))))

#7

I love OpenFL and Haxe!))

Thank you guys!))

2 Likes