Does’ nape ‘run faster than’ box2d '?
Why does “openfl” integrate “box2d” instead of “nape”?
I wouldn’t say that OpenFL “integrates” Box2D. We maintain a port of Box2D because it was a popular Flash library, and OpenFL is an implementation of the Flash API. Nape was already built with Haxe, so it didn’t need to be ported from another language to work with OpenFL. Use whichever one you prefer. We don’t officially endorse either library as being better than the other.
1 Like
The integration I mentioned refers to the automatic installation of “box2d” when installing “openfl”
haxelib install openfl
haxelib run openfl setup
I installed “openfl” on these command lines and also installed “box2d”. When I mean integration, I mean this
When I was learning ‘box2d’, ‘ai’ told me that ‘nape’ is faster